The government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. ~Ronald Reagan
Friday, October 30, 2009
Honduran rivals agree a deal to end crisis - Yahoo! News
Reuters are idiots. Zelaya was kicked out by the Honduran legislature and Supreme Court because he was unconstitutionally trying to keep himself in power. Honduras' constitutinal democracy was working just fine until we meddled. Obama is on the wrong side of history on this one.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Wisdom of Children
Last night I was attempting to instill some personal responsibility and accountability in my 6 year old son. I figured since he goes to school in California he is being bombarded by liberal messages, so a little counter programming would be a good thing.
I told him that when he grows up he should not depend on the Government to provide him with things. He asked why. I said “Because if the Government is powerful enough to give you things, it is powerful enough to take them away.” As I was about to continue, he interrupted and said. “It’s better to earn it right Dad?” “Yes son. It is better to earn it” I replied with a great big squeeze.
It is amazing to me that a 1st grader has the ability to comprehend this, yet many of our 536 elected officials in DC fail to grasp the simple concept.
Stop the bailouts. Stop the Government power grabs. Stop the nanny state attempts to control our lives. And for crying out loud, stop the spending. This country was founded on the backs of the individual trying to fulfill the American dream. When the individual has the potential to fail, there is motivation to succeed. This is the engine that drives us to prosperity. If you owe your existence to a handout or a bailout, then you will just sit back and take what comes. That is not the model for prosperity. This is not what we want to teach our children.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Assessment of CA-10 Special Election Race
There is a congressional special election in California next week in the district next to mine (CA-10). This election is to fill the vacant seat left by Obama appointee Ellen Tauscher, a Democrat who won her seat in 2008 by +34 percentage points. The Democratic Candidate is the current Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi, until recently a possible candidate for Governor who has been in statewide and National politician for over 20 years. I actually think Congressman will be a demotion for him, but it shows just how far the Democrat’s needed to go to win the race. The district leans blue and Obama carried it by +31. The district hasn’t voted republican since 1994. And they need to put up a guy with Statewide recognition to keep it safe.
The Republican challenger is David Hamer. He looks like a fine candidate, but he is not a powerhouse figure by any means. This is his first campaign as I understand it.
But recent polls put the Republican challenger down by 7 points. This district may not swing, but ominous signs are still there. The Democrats put up their best guy and win narrowly instead of by +30. The more moderate districts will swing to Republican in 2010 if this trend holds.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
NBA or NFL?
This is VERY INTERESTING!!!!
|
For the record: the sports leagues have similar amounts of criminal’s amongst their ranks, but I don’t pay their salary..
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Enumerated Powers
Yesterday the Senate Finance committee passed a Healthcare bill that includes health insurance mandates. These mandates require Americans to buy health insurance or else face a fine.
Putting aside all other issues for now, I think this may be unconstitutional.
The Federal Government is one with enumerated powers. That means the founders of the country set up limits to what the Federal government can do. The main source of power for most laws is the Tax and Spend clause and the Interstate Commerce Clause. I don’t see how either of these qualify the Federal Government to mandate that I buy an insurance product.
Bottom line: Do you think the Federal Government has the constitutional authority to mandate the purchase of a commercial product? Could they tell you that you had to buy a GM car? Or an Apple computer? I don’t think so, and I look forward to the debate.
They might try to wiggle around this by somehow pushing it to the states to enforce the law. States have a general policing power that gives them more regulatory authority than the Federal Government. But at first blush I am just not seeing how this can stand up to constitutional scrutiny.